Which case is significant because for civilians, it limits the PSP to sensitive positions?

Which case is significant because for civilians, it limits the PSP to sensitive positions?

• A. Greene v. McElroy
• B. Cole v. Young
• C. Service v. Dulles
• D. Clifford v. Shoultz

Answer: (B)

The main idea here is how security measures like the PSP should apply to civilian workers: they’re appropriate only for roles that involve access to sensitive information or duties that require tighter oversight. Cole v. Young supports this by holding that civilian security screening is not a blanket requirement for all civilians; it’s limited to positions deemed sensitive because those roles justify the intrusion on civil liberties and the need for protection of national interests. This makes it the best answer because it directly ties the scope of the PSP to the nature of the job, rather than applying it universally. Greene v. McElroy, in contrast, dealt with the general permissibility of loyalty investigations in federal employment, which is broader than just sensitive positions and thus isn’t the best fit for describing the scope limitation. The other cases concern citizenship and immigration issues, not the civilian scope of security screening, so they don’t address how the PSP should be limited to sensitive posts.

The main idea here is how security measures like the PSP should apply to civilian workers: they’re appropriate only for roles that involve access to sensitive information or duties that require tighter oversight. Cole v. Young supports this by holding that civilian security screening is not a blanket requirement for all civilians; it’s limited to positions deemed sensitive because those roles justify the intrusion on civil liberties and the need for protection of national interests. This makes it the best answer because it directly ties the scope of the PSP to the nature of the job, rather than applying it universally.

Greene v. McElroy, in contrast, dealt with the general permissibility of loyalty investigations in federal employment, which is broader than just sensitive positions and thus isn’t the best fit for describing the scope limitation. The other cases concern citizenship and immigration issues, not the civilian scope of security screening, so they don’t address how the PSP should be limited to sensitive posts.