As basic criteria, which two qualifications are required to review the personal information in a PSI?

As basic criteria, which two qualifications are required to review the personal information in a PSI?

• A. clearance and need-to-know
• B. authorization and confidentiality
• C. seniority and clearance
• D. clearance and consent

Answer: (A)

The essential idea is access control based on clearance and need-to-know. To review personal information in a PSI, you must hold an appropriate security clearance for the level of information and have a justified need-to-know—meaning your official duties require access to that specific information. Clearance confirms you’re authorized to handle sensitive data, while need-to-know restricts access to only those whose role requires it. Why this pair fits best: clearance provides the formal authorization to handle sensitive information, and need-to-know ensures access is limited to what is necessary for your work, protecting privacy and reducing unnecessary exposure. The other options don’t align with this access model: authorization paired with confidentiality isn’t the standard two-part gate for reviewing PSI data, since confidentiality describes how information should be protected rather than who may access it. Seniority doesn’t determine access rights, and consent isn’t the requirement for internal review of PSI data—consent is more about external sharing or disclosure.

The essential idea is access control based on clearance and need-to-know. To review personal information in a PSI, you must hold an appropriate security clearance for the level of information and have a justified need-to-know—meaning your official duties require access to that specific information. Clearance confirms you’re authorized to handle sensitive data, while need-to-know restricts access to only those whose role requires it.

Why this pair fits best: clearance provides the formal authorization to handle sensitive information, and need-to-know ensures access is limited to what is necessary for your work, protecting privacy and reducing unnecessary exposure. The other options don’t align with this access model: authorization paired with confidentiality isn’t the standard two-part gate for reviewing PSI data, since confidentiality describes how information should be protected rather than who may access it. Seniority doesn’t determine access rights, and consent isn’t the requirement for internal review of PSI data—consent is more about external sharing or disclosure.